Permanency Options Comparison Chart Children's Law Center Form
Use a Permanency Options Comparison Chart Children's Law Center template to make your document workflow more streamlined.
What the permanency options chart does
The Permanency Options Comparison Chart is a case-review document for comparing possible permanency pathways for a child and recording the considerations supporting that comparison. It is not, by itself, an adoption decree, guardianship order, or court filing. A Children’s Law Center team can complete the chart, identify the authorized reviewers, and route it through signNow for acknowledgments or signatures. The final chart, signing history, and access controls should remain subject to the organization’s confidentiality, case-management, and records-retention policies.
Who uses the permanency options chart
Child welfare teams
Children’s Law Center staff can use this chart to compare permanency pathways, document case considerations, and prepare an informed discussion with families and legal teams.
Case participants
Attorneys, social workers, and caregivers can review the chart together before recording decisions in the related case file or service plan.
How the permanency chart workflow works
Use the chart as a controlled review document: prepare the comparison, route it to authorized participants, and preserve the completed record.
Upload chart: Upload the completed comparison chart to signNow. Place fields: Add fields for staff, counsel, or participant acknowledgments. Send securely: Send the chart to each authorized reviewer. Complete record: Store the signed chart with its audit trail.
Quick steps for completing the chart
Prepare the child-specific comparison first, then use signNow to route the document and preserve its completion evidence.
Upload chart:
Upload the completed chart PDF. Detect fields:
Let signNow detect fillable fields. Assign roles:
Assign reviewers and signature fields. Send chart:
Send the chart for acknowledgment. Store record:
Download the signed chart and audit trail.
Recommended chart workflow setup
Configure the chart workflow around authorized reviewers, documented acknowledgments, and the Children’s Law Center’s case-record policy.
| Setting | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Authentication method | Email link with SMS OTP |
| Signature type | Electronic acknowledgment |
| Audit trail | Enabled for every completed chart |
| Document retention | Apply Children’s Law Center policy |
| Encryption | TLS 1.2 or 1.3 and AES-256 |
Best ROI. Our customers achieve an average 7x ROI within the first six months.
Scales with your use cases. From SMBs to mid-market, airSlate SignNow delivers results for businesses of all sizes.
Intuitive UI and API. Sign and send documents from your apps in minutes.
Inside the chart’s signNow audit trail
The audit trail records evidence about the completed permanency chart separately from the administrative steps used to prepare and send it.
Authenticate signer:
Capture timestamps:
Hash document:
Seal record:
Record activity:
Export trail:
Features for permanency option reviews
The chart brings permanency alternatives, case considerations, and review acknowledgments into one controlled document workflow for Children’s Law Center teams.
Clear comparison
A structured comparison keeps adoption, guardianship, reunification, and other permanency pathways visible in one document for focused case review.
Organized analysis
Document the factors considered for each permanency option without relying on scattered notes, emails, or separate worksheets.
Reusable format
Reusable fields help Children’s Law Center teams prepare consistent charts for matters involving different children, families, and case circumstances.
Review history
Routing the completed chart through signNow records who reviewed it and when, supporting a traceable internal workflow.
Remote signatures
Electronic signing can reduce handoffs when authorized staff, counsel, or other participants must acknowledge the completed comparison.
Stored record
A completed PDF and audit trail provide a consolidated record for internal files, subject to applicable confidentiality and retention policies.
Platform requirements for completing the chart
Prepare and review the Permanency Options Comparison Chart in an up-to-date browser such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge on Windows, macOS, iOS, or Android. signNow protects connections with TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3.
Browsers Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge Operating systems Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Devices Desktop and mobile web access
Organizations should use managed devices when the chart contains confidential child-welfare information. Administrators can align access with internal identity controls, configure SSO or API workflows where available, and preserve the completed chart and audit trail in an approved case-record system.
Security controls for confidential charts
Encrypted in transit:
Encrypted at rest:
Independent controls:
Information security:
Protected health data:
Electronic signatures:
Processing stages for the permanency chart
The chart’s processing time depends on case readiness and reviewer availability; the workflow below separates preparation, review, and record completion.
Prepare the chart
Deliver to reviewers
Collect review
Archive the record
Record-keeping practices for the chart
A controlled record process protects the chart’s confidentiality while preserving the evidence needed to understand who reviewed and acknowledged the permanency comparison.
Apply the approved retention policy
Export the audit trail with the chart
Restrict access to authorized reviewers
Archive the final record securely
Privacy pitfalls in permanency comparisons
Including unnecessary names, diagnoses, addresses, or case details can expose sensitive child and family information beyond the chart’s review purpose. A missing consent or acknowledgment field can leave reviewers’ positions unclear when the completed chart is later examined. Sending the chart to a personal email address can create an uncontrolled copy outside the Children’s Law Center’s approved case system. Using a shared template without checking child-specific fields can place one family’s information into another permanency comparison.
Risks from incomplete chart handling
Review dispute
Incomplete record
Privacy exposure
Version conflict
Troubleshooting the permanency chart workflow
Resolve field, reviewer, privacy, and recordkeeping questions before treating the Permanency Options Comparison Chart as complete.
Upload the chart as a PDF, then inspect detected fields before assigning reviewers. signNow’s templates and field tools allow staff to correct missing or misplaced signature, date, or text fields before sending.
Use assigned roles and required fields to identify who must review or acknowledge each section. The Business plan includes templates and audit trails; the sender should verify every required field before delivery.
Business includes legally binding eSignatures and audit trails. Business Premium adds bulk send, but a single permanency chart generally requires only an individually assigned workflow unless the organization has repeated standardized cases.
If the chart contains protected health information, signNow identifies HIPAA compliance as available with a business associate agreement. The Children’s Law Center must still apply its own privacy controls and approved disclosure procedures.
ESIGN and UETA support electronic signatures when intent, consent, attribution, and record reproducibility are established. The chart is not a substitute for a court order, decree, or other excluded document.
Export the completed PDF and audit trail from signNow, then store them in the approved case repository. Retention depends on the Children’s Law Center’s policy and any applicable state or federal rule.
Key performance indicators that demonstrate SignNow's proven track record.
BE READY TO GET MORE
Get this form now!
If you believe that this page should be taken down, please follow our DMCA take-down process.